The mechanisms underlying insulin resistance in acromegaly were investigated. Adipose tissue was obtained from nine patients with acromegaly who had in vivo insulin resistance and from 14 matched healthy control subjects. Receptor binding and the antilipolytic effect of insulin were determined in isolated fat cells. Insulin-induced glucose oxidation at a physiological hexose concentration was investigated in fat segments. In fat cells obtained from acromegaly patients after an overnight fast, insulin binding at low hormone concentrations was significantly reduced by 20-30%, insulin-induced antilipolysis was unchanged, but glucose oxidation was unresponsive to insulin. Since it has recently been observed that glucose feeding may rapidly modify insulin action in human adipocytes, fat cells were also obtained 60 min after an 100-g oral glucose load. In this situation, insulin binding at low hormone concentrations was further reduced to one-half of that in the control group, and the sensitivity of insulin-induced antilipolysis was markedly decreased in acromegaly. It is concluded that, in the fasting state, the action of insulin on glucose utilization but not on lipolysis is impaired in adipose tissue of acromegalic patients because of a postreceptor defect. After glucose ingestion, the resistance to insulin in acromegaly is further enhanced and antilipolysis is also impaired. Altered coupling between receptor and effector alone or in combination with an additional decrease in receptor binding may explain the enhancement of insulin resistance. These mechanisms may be essential factors in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance in acromegaly.
J Bolinder, J Ostman, S Werner, P Arner
Usage data is cumulative from April 2023 through April 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 66 | 0 |
37 | 10 | |
Scanned page | 60 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 7 | 0 |
Totals | 170 | 10 |
Total Views | 180 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.