Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Alerts
  • Advertising/recruitment
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • By specialty
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews...
    • Mechanisms Underlying the Metabolic Syndrome (Oct 2019)
    • Reparative Immunology (Jul 2019)
    • Allergy (Apr 2019)
    • Biology of familial cancer predisposition syndromes (Feb 2019)
    • Mitochondrial dysfunction in disease (Aug 2018)
    • Lipid mediators of disease (Jul 2018)
    • Cellular senescence in human disease (Apr 2018)
    • View all review series...
  • Collections
    • Recently published
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Concise Communication
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Scientific Show Stoppers
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • Recently published
  • Brief Reports
  • Technical Advances
  • Commentaries
  • Editorials
  • Hindsight
  • Review series
  • Reviews
  • The Attending Physician
  • First Author Perspectives
  • Scientific Show Stoppers
  • Top read articles
  • Concise Communication
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a letter
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article
  • Share this article
  • Need Help? E-mail the JCI
  • Top
  • References
  • Version history

Advertisement

Commentary Free access | 10.1172/JCI8203

DNA replication and smooth muscle cell hypertrophy

Kenneth Walsh,1,2 Ichiro Shiojima,1 and Antonio Gualberto1,3

1Division of Cardiovascular Research, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02135, USA2Program in Cell, Molecular and Developmental Biology, Tufts University, Sackler School of Biomedical Studies, Boston, Massachusetts 02135, USA3Central Research Division, Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut 06340, USA

Address correspondence to: Kenneth Walsh, Division of Cardiovascular Research, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, 736 Cambridge Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02135, USA. Phone: (617) 562-7501; Fax: (617) 562-7506; E-mail: kwalsh@opal.tufts.edu or kwalsh@world.std.com.

Find articles by Walsh, K. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Division of Cardiovascular Research, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02135, USA2Program in Cell, Molecular and Developmental Biology, Tufts University, Sackler School of Biomedical Studies, Boston, Massachusetts 02135, USA3Central Research Division, Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut 06340, USA

Address correspondence to: Kenneth Walsh, Division of Cardiovascular Research, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, 736 Cambridge Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02135, USA. Phone: (617) 562-7501; Fax: (617) 562-7506; E-mail: kwalsh@opal.tufts.edu or kwalsh@world.std.com.

Find articles by Shiojima, I. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Division of Cardiovascular Research, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02135, USA2Program in Cell, Molecular and Developmental Biology, Tufts University, Sackler School of Biomedical Studies, Boston, Massachusetts 02135, USA3Central Research Division, Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut 06340, USA

Address correspondence to: Kenneth Walsh, Division of Cardiovascular Research, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, 736 Cambridge Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02135, USA. Phone: (617) 562-7501; Fax: (617) 562-7506; E-mail: kwalsh@opal.tufts.edu or kwalsh@world.std.com.

Find articles by Gualberto, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

First published September 15, 1999 - More info

Published in Volume 104, Issue 6 on September 15, 1999
J Clin Invest. 1999;104(6):673–674. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI8203.
© 1999 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
First published September 15, 1999 - Version history

Vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) hypertrophy is the main cause of large-vessel noncompliance in elderly and hypertensive individuals. VSMC hypertrophy, as strictly defined, is an increase in cell size without associated increases in cell number. This process is associated with an increase in extracellular matrix deposition and an irreversible modulation of VSMC phenotype. VSMC hypertrophy has detrimental effects on vascular remodeling, with consequences on the circulation and metabolic demands of the left ventricle. Ultimately, VSMC hypertrophy can lead to systolic hypertension, altered coronary perfusion, and hypertrophy of the left ventricle. It also contributes to mortality associated with end-stage renal failure. These circumstances stress the need to develop a detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underlie the onset of VSMC hypertrophy.

In the article by Braun-Dullaeus et al. in this issue of the JCI (1), new insights about VSMC hypertrophy are derived from analyses of the cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitor p27Kip1 in angiotensin II–stimulated cells in vitro. The Cdk’s function to control cellular proliferation through their association with activating subunits, referred to as cyclins, whose levels are temporally regulated during the cell cycle. Cdk activities are also regulated through association with inactivating subunits, referred to as Cdk inhibitors. In cellular differentiation, the postmitotic state is achieved, in large part, by the upregulation of Cdk inhibitors that arrest cell-cycle activity. In addition to these developmental cues, Cdk inhibitor expression is also controlled by environmental conditions that modulate cell growth, including exposure to γ-irradiation, cell-cell contact, and cytokine stimulation. The Cdk inhibitor p27Kip1 and its homologues p21Cip1 and p57Kip1 have a broad specificity for Cdk’s, and they inhibit activity by forming higher-order complexes with the cyclin/Cdk holoenzyme. In VSMCs, the Cdk inhibitors p27Kip1 and p21Cip1 have previously been implicated in terminating VSMC proliferation in intimal lesions (2, 3).

Braun-Dullaeus et al. provide compelling evidence that suggests that p27Kip1 functions as a molecular switch in determining whether VSMCs undergo hypertrophy or hyperplasia in response to external stimuli. Their experiments show that various cyclins and Cdk’s are upregulated in response to both angiotensin II, which induces hypertrophy, and serum, which induces hyperplasia. However, levels of p27Kip1 decline in serum-treated cells but not in angiotensin II–treated cells. Moreover, it is shown that angiotensin II does not increase Cdc2 or Cdk2 activity, consistent with a cell-cycle block. To provide causal evidence that p27Kip1 controls VSMC hypertrophy, the investigators first show that VSMC hypertrophy could be induced in serum-stimulated cells when p27Kip1 is overexpressed. In critical experiments, antisense oligonucleotides were used to ablate p27Kip1 expression. Acute p27Kip1 ablation blocked hypertrophy and promoted hyperplasia in VSMCs upon incubation with angiotensin II. Simply said, this study suggests that VSMC hypertrophy is a consequence of growth stimulation when cell-cycle progression is blocked.

The observations of Braun-Dullaeus et al. in cultured VSMCs are consistent with the phenotype of the p27Kip1 knockout mouse. These mice contain enlarged organs that are comprised of an increased number of cells that, surprisingly, are smaller than corresponding cells from the wild-type mouse (4, 5). Since it has been shown that chronic stimulation of the renin-angiotensin system in rats will result in hypertension and VSMC hypertrophy (6), a prediction of the model put forth by Braun-Dullaeus et al. is that aging or renovascular hypertension would promote hyperplasia, rather than hypertrophy, in the capacitance vessels of p27Kip1 knockout mice. Such a study could provide important corroborative evidence for this hypothesis.

Although the observations of Braun-Dullaeus et al. significantly extend our understanding of VSMC hypertrophy, one must also acknowledge that their findings do not completely account for the VSMC phenotype observed in elderly and hypertensive patients and animals. For example, it has long been known that hypertrophic VSMCs are frequently polyploid, containing more than a diploid number of chromosomes (7). Although it has not been formally documented, hypertrophy-associated VSMC polyploidization probably arises from endoreplication, the reentry of cells with tetraploid DNA content into S phase. Therefore, Cdk inhibitors might be expected to inhibit polyploidization in VSMCs on the basis of their ability to block cell-cycle progression at G1 phase in tetraploid cells (8). Consistent with this hypothesis, it has been shown that loss of the Cdk inhibitor p21Cip1 leads to a disruption of cell-cycle checkpoint control and causes cells to accumulate polyploid nuclei (8, 9). Polyploidization in megakaryocytic cells is also associated with the downregulation of p21Cip1 and p27Kip1 (10). Furthermore, there may be a causal relationship between polyploidization and hypertrophy. Polyploid VSMCs have up to 5 times the mass and express twice as much extracellular matrix as their diploid counterparts (7, 11). This appears to be a general trait, as polyploidization in yeast is also associated with cell enlargement, which is attributed to lengthening of the G1 phase through suppression of G1 cyclins (12). Collectively, these findings suggest that other cell-cycle regulators may also participate in the hypertrophic process in VSMCs.

In summary, Braun-Dullaeus et al. have put forth a new and interesting hypothesis regarding the mechanisms that underlie VSMC hypertrophy. However, many questions remain. For example, what is the relationship between p27Kip1 and polyploidization in VSMCs? Is there a causal relationship between VSMC polyploidization and hypertrophy? Furthermore, Ushio-Fukai et al. (13) recently reported that the serine/threonine protein kinase Akt1 is essential for angiotensin II–induced VSMC hypertrophy. Thus, what is the relationship, if any, between p27Kip1 and Akt1? In view of recent advances in the understanding of molecular control mechanisms in DNA replication and hypertrophy, we anticipate rapid progress in this area.

References
  1. Braun-Dullaeus, R, Mann, M, Ziegler, A, von der Leyen, H, Dzau, V. A novel role for the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27Kip1 in angiotensin II–stimulated vascular smooth muscle cell hypertrophy. J Clin Invest 1999. 104:815-823.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Chen, D, et al. Down-regulation of cyclin-dependent kinase activity and cyclin A promoter activity in vascular smooth muscle cells by p27 (KIP-1), an inhibitor of neointima formation in the rat carotid artery. J Clin Invest 1997. 99:2334-2341.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Yang, Z-Y, et al. Role of the p21 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor in limiting intimal cell proliferation in response to arterial injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996. 93:7905-7910.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  4. Fero, ML, et al. A syndrome of multiorgan hyperplasia with features of gigantism, tumorigenesis, and female sterility in p27Kip1-deficient mice. Cell 1996. 85:733-744.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  5. Poolman, R, Li, J-M, Durand, B, Brooks, G. Altered expression of cell cycle proteins and prolonged duration of cardiac myocyte hyperplasia in p27KIP1 knockout mice. Circ Res 1999. 85:117-127.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Owens, G, Schwartz, S. Vascular smooth muscle cell hypertrophy and hyperploidy in the Goldblatt hypertensive rat. Circ Res 1983. 53:491-501.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Owens, G, Schwartz, S. Alterations in vascular smooth muscle mass in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Circ Res 1982. 51:280-289.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Stewart, Z, Leach, S, Pietenpol, J. p21Waf1/Cip1 inhibition of cyclin E/Cdk2 activity prevents endoreduplication after mitotic spindle disruption. Mol Cell Biol 1999. 19:205-215.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Waldman, T, Lengauer, C, Kinzler, K, Vogelstein, B. Uncoupling of S phase and mitosis induced by anticancer agents in cells lacking p21. Nature 1996. 381:713-716.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  10. Datta, N, Williams, J, Long, M. Differential modulation of G1-S-phase cyclin-dependent kinase 2/cyclin complexes occurs during the acquisition of a polyploid DNA content. Cell Growth Differ 1998. 9:639-650.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  11. van Neck, J, et al. Effect of ploidy on transcription levels in cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells. FEBS Lett 1992. 297:189-195.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  12. Galitski, T, Saldanha, A, Styles, C, Lander, E, Fink, G. Ploidy regulation of gene expression. Science 1999. 285:251-254.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  13. Ushio-Fukai, M, et al. Reactive oxygen species mediate the activation of Akt/protein kinase B by angiotensin II in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 1999. 274:22699-22704.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (September 15, 1999): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a letter
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article
  • Share this article
  • Need Help? E-mail the JCI

Go to:

  • Top
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement
Follow JCI:
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts