Baseline characteristics of participants in the natural history study of macular telangiectasia (MacTel) MacTel Project Report No. 2

TE Clemons, MC Gillies, EY Chew, AC Bird… - Ophthalmic …, 2010 - Taylor & Francis
TE Clemons, MC Gillies, EY Chew, AC Bird, T Peto, MJ Figueroa, MW Harrington
Ophthalmic epidemiology, 2010Taylor & Francis
Purpose: To describe the baseline characteristics of a large international cohort of patients
with macular telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel Type 2) in anticipation of a longitudinal natural
history study to evaluate structural and functional changes, identify potential risk factors and
related outcomes. Methods: Images including fundus photographs, fluorescein angiograms,
optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence were collected. A grading
system for MacTel type 2 was developed by the central reading center to evaluate lesion …
Purpose: To describe the baseline characteristics of a large international cohort of patients with macular telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel Type 2) in anticipation of a longitudinal natural history study to evaluate structural and functional changes, identify potential risk factors and related outcomes.
Methods: Images including fundus photographs, fluorescein angiograms, optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence were collected. A grading system for MacTel type 2 was developed by the central reading center to evaluate lesion characteristics. Relationships between lesion characteristics and visual acuity were evaluated.
Results: A total of 310 participants have been enrolled in the study. The mean time since diagnosis was 3 years (range 0 to 25 years). The mean age at the baseline examination was 61 ± 9 years. The mean visual acuity in the better eye was approximately 20/32 Snellen equivalents and approximately 20/50 in the worse eye. The visual acuity in the better eye of half of the participants was 20/32 or better. We found some relationships between visual acuity and lesions characteristic of MacTel Type 2.
Conclusions: This is the first large-scale study of patients with MacTel Type 2. More than half of the patients had 20/32 or better vision in their better eye, which is a sign that decreased function in these participants may not be reflected in central visual acuity. These findings highlight the limitation of using visual acuity measurements as a measure of function and as an outcome measure in potential clinical trials in patients with MacTel Type 2.
Taylor & Francis Online