[HTML][HTML] A randomised, double-blind phase III study of pazopanib in patients with advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: final overall survival results and …

CN Sternberg, RE Hawkins, J Wagstaff… - European journal of …, 2013 - Elsevier
CN Sternberg, RE Hawkins, J Wagstaff, P Salman, J Mardiak, CH Barrios, JJ Zarba…
European journal of cancer, 2013Elsevier
BACKGROUND: In this randomised phase III study (VEG105192; NCT00334282),
pazopanib previously demonstrated statistically and clinically meaningful improvement of
progression-free survival versus placebo in patients with advanced/metastatic renal cell
carcinoma (mRCC). Final overall survival (OS) and updated safety results are now reported.
METHODS: Treatment-naive or cytokine-pretreated mRCC patients (n= 435) stratified and
randomised (2: 1) to pazopanib 800mg daily or placebo, were treated until disease …
BACKGROUND
In this randomised phase III study (VEG105192; NCT00334282), pazopanib previously demonstrated statistically and clinically meaningful improvement of progression-free survival versus placebo in patients with advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Final overall survival (OS) and updated safety results are now reported.
METHODS
Treatment-naive or cytokine-pretreated mRCC patients (n=435) stratified and randomised (2:1) to pazopanib 800mg daily or placebo, were treated until disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity. Upon progression, placebo patients could receive pazopanib through an open-label study. Final OS in the intent-to-treat population was analysed using a stratified log-rank test. Rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) and inverse probability of censoring weighted (IPCW) analyses were performed post-hoc to adjust for crossover.
FINDINGS
The difference in final OS between pazopanib- and placebo-treated patients was not statistically significant (22.9 versus 20.5months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR]=0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71–1.16; one-sided P=.224). Early and frequent crossover from placebo to pazopanib and prolonged duration of crossover treatment confounded the OS analysis. In IPCW analyses, pazopanib decreased mortality (HR=0.504; 95% CI, 0.315–0.762; two-sided P=.002). Similar, albeit non-significant, results were obtained in RPSFT analyses (HR=0.43; 95% CI, 0.215–1.388; two-sided P=.172). Since the last cutoff, cumulative exposure to pazopanib increased by 30%. The pazopanib safety profile showed no new safety signals or changes in the type, frequency and severity of adverse events.
INTERPRETATION
Although no significant difference in OS was observed in this study, extensive crossover from placebo to pazopanib confounded final OS analysis. Post-hoc analyses adjusting for crossover suggest OS benefit with pazopanib treatment for mRCC patients.
Elsevier